Title: Post-tensioned splice system for precast, prestressed concrete piles: Part 3, capacity verification from laboratory and full-scale testing
Date Published: September - October 2018
Volume: 63
Issue: 5
Page Numbers: 19 - 35
Authors: Zhongxin Wu, Kevin Johnson, Gray Mullins, and Rajan Sen
https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij63.5-02

Click here to view the full article.

Abstract

Splicing precast, prestressed concrete piles has historically been difficult because the attachment detail requires either preplanned considerations and cast-in connection details or onsite coring and doweling when unplanned pile extensions are needed. When the piles are driven after splicing, the splice connection is prone to tensile failures due to the inability to transfer tensile driving stresses through the connection and into the other pile segment. Focusing on preplanned splices, the Florida Department of Transportation limits tension stresses during driving to 250 and 500 psi (1700 and 3400 kPa) for epoxy dowel splices and mechanical splices, respectively. This can limit the ability to efficiently drive the pile to the point that it may even be impossible. In response to the need for a more robust splicing methodology, an alternative pile-splicing approach incorporating post-tensioning was developed. The concept eliminates the limitations on tension stresses during driving. This is the third of three papers that details the development and implementation of the new approach into a prototype system. This involved laboratory and full-scale studies and subsequent ultimate load verification tests. The findings show that the concept is scalable and implementable in commercial facilities with minor adjustments.

References

Mullins, G., K. Johnson, and R. Sen. 2018. “Post-tensioned Splice System for Precast, Prestressed Concrete Piles: Part 1, Conceptual Design.” PCI Journal 63 (1): 26–39.

Mullins, G., Z. Wu, K. Johnson, and R. Sen. 2018. “Post-tensioned Splice System for Precast, Prestressed Concrete Piles: Part 2, Field Implementation and Driving Spliced Pile.” PCI Journal 63 (3): 28–40.

FDOT (Florida Department of Transportation). 2016. Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. Tallahassee, FL: FDOT.

Mullins, G., and R. Sen. 2015. “Investigation and Development of an Effective, Economical, and Efficient Concrete Pile Splice.” Final research report. Tallahassee, FL: FDOT.

Ansley, M. 2002. Load Test on Sure-Lock Square Pile Splice. Tallahassee, FL: FDOT.

Beitelman, T. 2011. Structural Performance of ICP PHC Piles. Tallahassee, FL: FDOT.

FDOT. 2016. Design Standards for Design Construction, Maintenance and Utility Operation on the State Highway System, Indices 20614 and 20624. Tallahassee, FL: FDOT.

ACI (American Concrete Institute) Committee 503. 2002. Guide for the Selection of Polymer Adhesives with Concrete (Reapproved 2003). ACI 503.5R-92. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.

Naaman, A. E. 2012. Prestressed Concrete Analysis and Design. 3rd ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Techno Press 3000.

Cook, R., M. McVay, and K. Britt. 2003. Alternatives for Precast Pile Splices – Parts 1 and 2. Final report to FDOT, report BC354 RPWO #80. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering.

Kang, Y. 1977. “Non-linear Geometric, Material, and Time Dependent Analysis of Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Frame.” PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley, CA.

Wu, Z. 2016. “Flexural Behavior of Post-Tensioning Spliced Prestressed Concrete Piles.” PhD diss., University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.

Mullins, G. 2014. Direct conversation with Charles Rudie, Parsons Brinkerhoff Inc., design engineer for the Choctawhatchee Bay Bridge, FL, March 19.