Title: A Probabilistic Comparison of Prestress Loss Methods in Prestressed Concrete Beams
Date: September-October, 2004
Volume: 49
Issue: 5
Page number: 52-69
Author(s): Christopher G. Gilbertson, Theresa M. (Tess) Ahiborn
https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.09012004.52.69

Click here to access the full journal article

Abstract

Camber and long-term deflections are directly linked to the loss of prestressing force, a characteristic of all prestressed concrete members. In this investigation, the effects of the inherent variability of the  parameters used to estimate prestress loss was studied for two typical bridge beam cases using several prestress loss predictive methods at final service conditions. A parametric study was conducted  to assess the general effect of single parameter variation on the calculation of prestress loss. Monte Carlo simulations were used to assess the distribution of prestress loss considering the variability of all  parameters simultaneously. Results of the Monte Carlo simulations were also used to evaluate the impact of loss variability on deflection and cracking moment calculations. Results show that the  variability of parameters has a notable effect on prestress loss variation and that this variation significantly influences the estimated deflection and cracking moment of prestressed concrete beams. Indeed, the variation  n camber between beams cast  on the same prestressing bed can be partially explained through the variability of materials and predictive methods used.

References

1. Steinberg, Eric P., “Probabilistic Assessment of Prestress Loss in Pretensioned Prestressed Concrete,” PCI JOURNAL, V. 40, No. 6, November-December 1995, pp. 76-85.

2. PCI Committee on Prestress Losses, “Recommendations for Estimating Prestress Losses,” PCI JOURNAL, V. 20, No. 4, July-August 1975, pp. 44-75.

3. AASHTO, Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, Sixteenth Edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 1999, and 2001 Interim.

4. AASHTO, LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Second Edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 2000.

 5. Naaman, Antoine F., Prestressed Concrete Analysis and Design - Fundamentals, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1982, pp. 275-3 15.

6. PC! Design Handbook, Fifth Edition,  Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute, Chicago, IL, 1999, pp. 2-5, 4-63 — 4- 67.

7. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (3 18-99) and Commentary (318R-99),” American Concrete Institute,  Farmington Hills, MI, 1999.

8. Zia, Paul, et al., “Estimating Prestress Losses,” Concrete international, V. 1, No. 3, June 1979, pp. 32-38.

9. PCI Bridge Design Manual, First Edition, Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute, Chicago, IL, 2000.

10. CEB-FIP, CEB-FIP Model Code 1990, Design Code, Comité Euro-International du Béton, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1993.

11. Kosmatka. Steven H., and Panarese,  William C., Design and Control of  Concrete Mixtures, Thirteenth Edition, Portland Cement Association, Skokie,  IL, 1994, pp. 80-8 1.

12. Grumbine, Tom, Phone Interview, Grand River Infrastructure, PRE MARC, Corp.. 2701 Chicago Drive, SW., Grand Rapids, MI 49509-1604,  September 20, 2001.

13. Gilbertson, Christopher G., “Probabilistic Assessment of Several Prestress Loss Methods,” MSCE Thesis,  Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, 2001.

14. Mirza, Sher Au, Kikuchi, Dennis K., and MacGregor, James G., “Flexural Strength Reduction Factor for Bonded Prestressed Concrete Beams,” ACI Journal, V. 77, No. 4, July-August 1980, pp.   237-246.

15. Siriaksorn, A., and Naaman, A., “Reliability of Partially Prestressed Beams at Serviceability Limit States,” Thesis, Department of Materials Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago Circle,  Chicago, IL, June 1980,

16. Ellingwood, Bruce, “Reliability Basis of Load and Resistance Factors for Reinforced Concrete Design,” NBS Building Science Series 110, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC, February  1978.

17. Ayyub, Bilal M., and McCuen, Richard H.. Probability, Statistics, & Reliability for Engineers, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1997.

18. Ahlborn, T. M., French, C. E., and Shield, C. K., “High Strength Concrete Prestressed Bridge Girders: Long-Term and Flexural Behavior,” Minnesota Department of Transportation, Report #  MN/RC—2000—32, 390 pp., 2000.