Title: Development of a precast concrete barrier wall system for bridge decks
Date: Winter, 2014
Volume: 59
Issue: 1
Page number: 83-102
Author(s): Gaurang Patel, Khaled Sennah, Hossein Azimi, Clifford Lam, Reza Kianoush
https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.01012014.83.102

Click here to access the full journal article

Abstract

This paper presents a PL-3 precast concrete barrier wall system to accelerate the replacement of deteriorated bridges. The proposed connection detail is intended to expedite construction; minimize traffic disruption; improve work-zone safety, quality, and constructability; and reduce life-cycle cost. The proposed precast concrete barrier is connected to the deck slab using pretensioned threaded steel rods. The proposed malefemale vertical joint between adjacent precast concrete barriers would maintain barrier continuity to spread the reaction of vehicle impact. Five full-scale barrier models were fabricated and tested to collapse to examine their ultimate capacities and crack patterns. A control model represented the cast-in-place concrete barrier. Two models represented the proposed precast concrete barrier system. Both models were loaded to induce failure at the barrier–deck slab junction. Two precast concrete barrier models were loaded at midlength and edge, respectively. One of these included the cantilever portion of the deck slab. The results show that the proposed precast concrete barrier system is as good as the cast-in-place concrete barrier with respect to ultimate load-carrying capacity at the deck slab–barrier connection.

References  

Shah, B., K. Sennah, R. Kianoush, S. Tu, and C. Lam. 2007. “Experimental Study on Prefabricated Concrete Bridge Girder-to-Girder Intermittent-Bolted Connection Systems.” ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering 12 (5): 570–584.  

Shah, B., K. Sennah, R. Kianoush, S. Tu, and C. Lam. 2006. “Flange-to-Flange Moment Connections for Precast Concrete Deck Bulb-Tee Bridge Girders.” PCI Journal 51 (6): 86–107.  

Sennah, K., G. Patel, and R. Kianoush. 2008. Development of Precast Barrier Wall System for Bridge Decks. Report submitted to MTO (Ministry of Transportation of Ontario) Highway Infrastructure Innovation Funding Program. St. Catharines, ON, Canada: MTO.

CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2006. Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code. CAN/CSA-S6-06. Toronto, ON, Canada: CSA.5. MTO (Ministry of Transportation of Ontario). 2003. MTO Structural Manual. St. Catharines, ON, Canada: MTO.

AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). 1989. AASHTO Guide Specifications for Bridge Railings. Washington, DC:AASHTO.  

AASHTO. 1977. AASHTO Guide for Selecting, Locating, and Designing Traffic Barriers. Washington, DC:AASHTO.  

AASHTO. 2004. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.

CSA. 2004. Design of Concrete Structures. CSAA23.3. Mississauga, ON, Canada: CSA.  

ACI (American Concrete Institute) Committee 318. 2005. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-05) and Commentary (ACI 318R-05). Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.  

ASTM C39/C39M-12a. 2012. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.

ASTM C109/C109M-12. 2012. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.

CSA. 2006. Commentary on CAN/CSA-S6-06, Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code. Toronto, ON, Canada: CSA.