Title: Performance of Full-Depth Shear Keys in Adjacent Prestressed Box Beam Bridges
Date: March-April, 1998
Volume: 43
Issue: 2
Page number: 72-79
Author(s): Jyotirmay Lall, Sreenivas Alampalli, Eugene F. DiCocco
https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03011998.72.79
Click here to access the full journal article
Abstract
Bridge decks supported by adjacent precast, prestressed concrete beams have become increasingly popular in recent years due to their ease of construction, shallow superstructure, and aesthetic appeal. In New York State prior to 1992, such structures were built by placing a number of precast beams alongside one another and connecting them through 12 in. (0.305 m) deep grouted keyways called shear keys to transfer shear forces across the structure. After the grout hardens, the beams are transversely posttensioned and a composite, cast-in-place deck is poured over them. Prompted by the frequent appearance of longitudinal deck cracking over these partial-depth shear keys soon after construction, full-depth shear keys with more transverse tendons were adopted in 1992. A follow-up study evaluated the performance of this new full-depth shear key/transverse tie system. Results indicate that this method has reduced the frequency of shear key related deck cracking.
References
1. Tang, J., "Shear Key Construction for Precast Unit Bridges," Client Report 58, Engineering Research and Development Bureau, New York State Department of Transportation, Albany, NY, February 1992.
2. "Modifications of the Current Shear Key and Tendon System for Adjacent Beam Prestressed Concrete Structures," Engineering Instruction 92-10, New York State Department of Transportation, Albany, NY, March 4, 1992.
3. Lall, J., DiCocco, E. F ., and Alampalli, S., "Full-Depth Shear Key Performance in Adjacent Prestressed Beam Bridges," Special Report 124, Transportation Research and Development Bureau, New York State Department of Transportation, Albany, NY, March 1997.
4. Gulyas, R. J., Wirthlin, G. J., and Champa, J. T., "Evaluation of Keyway Grout Test Methods for Precast Concrete Bridges," PCI JOURNAL, V. 40, No. 1, January-February 1995, pp. 44-57. March-April 1998 fabric or by providing No. 4 or No. 5 reinforcing bars in both directions at a spacing required by the design. 3. Provide higher transverse posttensioning forces and two tendons over the depth of the beam at each post-tensioning location. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the New York State Department of Trans- REFERENCES
5. Nottingham, D., Discussion of "Evaluation of Keyway Grout Test Methods for Precast Concrete Bridges," PCI JOURNAL, V. 40, No. 4 , July-August 1995, pp. 98- 103.
6. Nottingham, D., "Joint Grouting in Alaskan Bridges and Dock Decks," Concrete International, V. 18, No. 2, February 1996, pp. 45-48.
7. Hlavacs , G. M., Long, T., Miller, R. A., and Baseheart, T. M., "Nondestructive Determination of Response of Shear Keys to Environmental and Structural Cyclic Loadings," Transportation Research Record 1574, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 18-24.
8. El-Remaily, A., Tadros, M. K., Yamane, T., and Krause, G., "Transverse esign of Adjacent Precast Prestressed Concrete Box Girder Bridges," PCI JOURNAL, V. 41 , No. 4, July-August 1996, pp. 96-113. portation. This work was partially funded by the Federal Highway Administration, United States Department of Transportation. The cooperation of numerous engineers in inspecting bridges within a short time period is gratefully acknowledged. Duane Carpenter and David Rettig provided valuable help in drafting the survey questionnaire and establishing the list of target bridges. Osman HagElsafi, Robert J. Perry, Mathew Royce, Arthur Yannotti, and Joseph Savoie provided useful comments.
9. Stanton, J. F ., and Mattock, A. H., "Load Distribution and Connection Design for Precast Stemmed Multibeam Bridge Superstructures," Report 287, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, November 1986.
10. Martin, L. D., and Osborn, A. E. N., "Connections for Modular Concrete Bridge Decks," Report FHWA-82/106, Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, McLean, VA, August 1983 (NTIS Document PB-118058).
11. "Investigation of Adjacent Prestressed Concrete Box Girder Spacing and Joint Alternatives," Memorandum from E. F. DiCocco to M. Flynn, Structures Design and Construction Division, New York State Department of Transportation, Albany, NY, September 18, 1995.
12. Standard Specifications: Construction and Materials, New York State Department of Transportation, Albany, NY, 1990.